- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:07:45 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > > We identified 3 use cases requiring language support: > > > > Martyn's > > Jan's > > OCLC's > > > > Of these Martyn's did not consider representation of language in a literal > > to be important. The other two found the M&S specification of language as > > part of a literal to be useful and adequate for their needs. > > Really? they found it useful? > I thought the OCLC folks got their job done > without using xml:lang. My mistake - that should have read Eric's Dublin Core use case, not OCLC. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 14:10:22 UTC