- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:31:54 +0100
- To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, bdehora@interx.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 02:52 PM 7/10/01 -0700, Sergey Melnik wrote:
>resource (constant) = URI, name, referring expression
I think that's clearly at odds with RFC2396 (which seems the nearest thing
we have to a universally accepted starting point for defining these things):
[RFC 2396, section 1.1]:
Resource
A resource can be anything that has identity. Familiar
examples include an electronic document, an image, a service
(e.g., "today's weather report for Los Angeles"), and a
collection of other resources. Not all resources are network
"retrievable"; e.g., human beings, corporations, and bound
books in a library can also be considered resources.
etc.
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 13:29:13 UTC