Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)

At 11:22 AM 7/13/01 -0700, pat hayes wrote:
>However, maybe I was wrong, but I have been assuming that 'literal' 
>referred not only to <data:..> but also to things like <string:..> and 
><integer:....>, ie data types more generally (??). If so, I think it 
>wouldnt be correct to say that all of these only denote themsleves, eg 
>something labelling an integer wouldn't actually be an integer.

A data (sic) point here:  'data:' is a defined URL scheme [1], 'string:' 
and 'integer:' are not (that I know of).

#g
--

[1] RFC2397 - http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2397.txt


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended 
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or 
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, 
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the 
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being 
passed on.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by 
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.

Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 10:51:45 UTC