Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon

At 11:37 PM 7/23/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:


>Graham Klyne wrote:
>[...]
> > So where does this leave the original discussion?  I think we still have
> > every anonymous resource being something whose existence is asserted.
>
>Winding back the stack, (is the data still there?) you objected to the
>use case on the grounds that it represented a query template and was thus
>not sanctioned by M&S.
>
>I think we've got to the point where this is a legitimate use case.  Yes?

Yes.   Sorry for the unnecessary diversion.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 11:23:41 UTC