- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 00:29:49 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Oh, and to get my positions on these issues on the record: > <rdf:Description rdf:Description="foo"/> Illegal. > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:Description>foo</rdf:Description> > </rdf:Description> Illegal. > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:Bag>foobar</rdf:Bag> > </rdf:Description> Well-formed document, but may not meet higher-level constraints. _:anon rdf:Bag "foobar" . > <rdf:Description rdf:aboutEachPrefix="foo"/> > <foo:bar>foobar</foo:bar> > </rdf:Description> As far as I know, use of aboutEachPrefix is illegal. > Also, he is questioning our resolution of: > > <rdf:_1> > <foo:bar>foobar</foo:bar> > </rdf:_1> Well-formed document, but may not meet higher-level constraints. _:anon rdf:type rdf:_1 . _:anon foo:bar "foobar" . If my resolutions seem weird, it is because I see a difference between strictly syntactical items in the RDF namespace, and those which appear in the model. (Syntactical items are illegal when found out of place, model items are not.) I wish these two groups were separated better (i.e. model ones in the schema namespace) but I don't think it would be a good idea to modify namespaces now. However, I do ask that in drafts we put together, the difference between these two groups is clear. -- "Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2001 01:29:52 UTC