- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:26:39 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I know what this is getting at (and I know why "thingies" is being used), but on the other hand, you've got to admit the humor in a bare reading of this, which suggests we're going to clarify the semantics of RDF by mapping its concepts to "thingies" (or groupings of them). I thought before that "resource" was a little vague. I'm glad we're clearing that up! :-) --Frank PS: An OMG committee many years ago used "frogs" for very much the same reasons. Brian McBride wrote: > snip > An interpretation I of STATEMENTS, a set of statements > {s1, s2, ... ,sn} where each si is an n-triple statement, > consists of: > > A set R of thingies > -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 13:31:55 UTC