- From: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM <spetschu@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:41:37 -0700
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@baltimore.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
The use case I have in mind is a metadata repository where new resources are constantly being added, but they may be 'tagged' at a later time. In this case, an empty <rdf:description about="urn:myscheme:some_object_id"> </rdf:description> would indicate that the resource urn:myscheme:some_object_id is a part of the current domain of discourse, but nothing has been said about it. So the resource is flagged as one that needs someone to meta-tag it. Of course, there are many other ways to solve this such as meta-meta info to indicate the tagging information, but this isn't reason enough to explicitly disallow it... cheers, - steve Stephen Petschulat Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@balt To: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA imore.com> cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought 16/07/2001 05:36 AM Please respond to Graham Klyne At 10:55 AM 7/13/01 -0400, Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM wrote: >Agreed. Note that it brings the Subject into the RDF graph... the lack of >arcs itself can be meaningful. Really? That (i.e. "the lack of arcs itself can be meaningful") goes against my understanding of RDF. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 12:46:56 UTC