- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:19:28 +0100 (BST)
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Graham Klyne wrote: > (b) can you point to ways in which M&S 1.0 supports your proposal to have > special treatment of anonymous resources in the RDF model? Ignoring any FOL and just taking the point of view "rdf is a data model", I wrote this a long time ago, but it indicates special treatment of anonymous resources is required: http://ioctl.org/rdf/discuss/anonymous#Complications -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Usenet: The separation of content AND presentation - simultaneously.
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 09:20:37 UTC