- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:04:58 -0400 (EDT)
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > On Wednesday, July 11, 2001, at 05:40 AM, Brian McBride wrote: > > > All RDF applications > > must specify whether or not language tagging in literals is > > significant; > > that is, whether or not language is considered when performing string > > matching or other processing. > > Or what? Under penalty of death? Seriously, I think that wording > such as this should be softened somewhat in the new spec... if > we don't change xml:lang, that is. I have a similar eye-rolling reaction to this sentence. Primarily because "RDF application" is such a woolly term, embracing Schemas, parsers, T-shirt designers, anything that applies RDF for some purpose. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 12:04:59 UTC