Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal

Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> > I'm not interested
> > in adopting it separately from a solution
> > to rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure.
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> (I'm not interested
> > in adopting it at all; but this issue allows me
> > to give some justification, over and above 'yuk!')
> 
> I see 'yuk', what's the justification?

that it's connected with is-xml-structure; i.e. see above.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 18:27:36 UTC