- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:26:07 -0700
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, bdehora@interx.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 02:52 PM 7/10/01 -0700, Sergey Melnik wrote: > >resource (constant) = URI, name, referring expression > > I think that's clearly at odds with RFC2396 (which seems the nearest thing > we have to a universally accepted starting point for defining these things): > > [RFC 2396, section 1.1]: > > Resource > A resource can be anything that has identity. Familiar > examples include an electronic document, an image, a service > (e.g., "today's weather report for Los Angeles"), and a > collection of other resources. Not all resources are network > "retrievable"; e.g., human beings, corporations, and bound > books in a library can also be considered resources. Hm. From reading M&S it feels though that Resources are URI-identifiable/-ied things. I think this is *the* top-priority issue that we have to clarify and hold on (e-)paper. Sergey
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 17:00:18 UTC