Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon

>On Monday, July 23, 2001, at 09:26  PM, pat hayes wrote:
>
>>It amounts to a global unique-name assumption, which is obviously 
>>not correct on the Web, since it isnt even correct on many web 
>>pages. It may be correct (in an ideal world) for URL's, but it 
>>cannot be assumed for all URIs
>
>Do you mean URNs, not URLs?

No, I meant URL's, which I take to mean a URI that locates something. 
I'm not sure about URN's: I don't see any global unique-name 
assumption (ie the assumption that everything has a unique name, so 
different names must denote distinct things) in the URN specs 
anywhere, but maybe I just havnt found it.

Pat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
(650)859 6569 w
(650)494 3973 h (until September)
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 02:40:46 UTC