- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:36:14 +0100
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- CC: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Frank, I had been hoping to have Danbri around when we discussed this and he won't be there tomorrow, but you are right - it would be better not to waste time. We will make time for this in tomorrow's agenda. Brian Frank Manola wrote: > > I'd like to see the agenda explicitly reflect reception of the attached > message (and referenced paper) and that we have an action item to deal > with it. > > --Frank > > -- > Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation > 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 > mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL > Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 05:33:16 -0400 (EDT) > Resent-From: www-rdf-logic@w3.org > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:31:41 +0200 > From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl> > Organization: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org > > Now that the RDF Core Working group has started its activities, the > "joint committee" who has designed DAML+OIL has written a document that > describes which areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention based on our > experiences with defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF Schema. > > You can find the document at > http://www.daml.org/2001/07/RDFS-DAML+OIL-coordination.html > > On behalf of the "joint committee", > > Frank van Harmelen. > ---- > Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh > Department of AI, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands > tel (+31)-20-444 7731 fax&voicemail (+31)-84-8722806 > > -------- > > Abstract: > > This document describes which areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention > based on our experiences with defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF > Schema. It is input from the DAML+OIL Joint Committee to the RDF Core > working group. > > Contents: > > what does DAML+OIL depend on from RDF(S) > RDF triple structure > RDF Schema constructions > what does DAML+OIL not use at all > reification > containers > meta-classes > what changes does DAML+OIL require in RDF(S) > multiple domains with intersection semantics > multiple ranges with intersection semantics > cycles in subclass- and subproperty-hierarchies > what areas of RDF(S) problematic > syntax > normalisation > datatypes > scoping > layering > Syntax of URIs: > Semantics of URIs:
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 12:38:49 UTC