- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:47:33 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, July 11, 2001, at 12:27 PM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> 1. Are anonymous resources allowed in the abstract graph syntax?
Not explicitly... I mean, I'm fine with triples stating
anonymity, but not with a special type of "anonymous" resource.
> No specific mechanism for generating such URIs is mandated, but
> the following options might be considered:
This is the problem I have. I think all parsers should spit out
equivalent genids for the same document -- the spec should
mandate the genid to use.
--
"Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 13:47:40 UTC