Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

On Wednesday, July 11, 2001, at 12:27  PM, Graham Klyne wrote:

>   1. Are anonymous resources allowed in the abstract graph syntax?

Not explicitly... I mean, I'm fine with triples stating 
anonymity, but not with a special type of "anonymous" resource.

> No specific mechanism for generating such URIs is mandated, but 
> the following options might be considered:

This is the problem I have. I think all parsers should spit out 
equivalent genids for the same document -- the spec should 
mandate the genid to use.

--
       "Aaron Swartz"      |              The Semantic Web
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> |        i'm working to make it happen

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 13:47:40 UTC