- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 01:26:00 +0100
- To: rdaniel@interwoven.com
- Cc: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
... > For M&S 2, we will want to figure out some way of adding data types > to literals. I bring up typing now because a really obvious way of > handling typing, if you have identifiers for the literals, is to > create triples with those URIs as the subjects and rdf:type as the > predicates. We should look into that. But I don't think we should > generate data: URLs now in the expectation that they will be useful > then. They may not actually work in all cases where they need to. > We may need some other way of getting URIs for the literals. I think I can follow you Ron. One way we have been going along is anonymous nodes e.g. [ log:is "some-literal-string"; <some-property> <some-value>; ...] and that node can be the sub/object of a statement. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 19:26:18 UTC