- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:25:32 -0700
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On Wednesday, July 11, 2001, at 06:18 AM, Bill de hÓra wrote: > >>>o the WG agrees that URI's can be assigned to denote literals. >> >>Is this to say: the wg indicates that people may assign URIs >>to Literals in their RDF data? I think I would be fine with >>this, but I still don't understand what is being described. >>Is a Literal simply a resource that can be present in the >>web (ie on a computer)? > >A literal is a resource representing the literal -- the string. Sorry, I can't follow this (in fact, I can't even parse it :-). Do you mean a literal is a resource that represents *itself* ? Can you expand on what you mean a little more, maybe with a simple example? Thanks. Pat Hayes --------------------------------------------------------------------- (650)859 6569 w (650)494 3973 h (until September) phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 17:25:35 UTC