- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:28:21 +0100
- To: Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com
- Cc: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > However, I'll also note that this is a side issue. The real issue would > seem to be the N-triple representation, and this approach suggests that > generated URIs would be needed in the N-triple representation. Why? What's wrong with _:label? Why not Frank's option a. these resources are "anonymous" in the sense that they don't have URIs. However, they have to have *identifiers* of some kind in order to reflect them in triples. In this case, the M&S should say that another kind of identifier is internally generated to identify "anonymous" resources, and say what the characteristics of those identifiers are (like, they're internal, temporary, not meant for use outside of something like a "session", ...) and how they work compared to ordinary URIs. ? -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 08:29:27 UTC