Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes

On Sunday, July 22, 2001, at 05:09  AM, Dave Beckett wrote:

> RDF/XML parsers can legitimately attack the RDF statement generation
> in different orders (e.g. suck it all into a DOM and take top level
> elements in reverse order), and they can thus generate identifiers
> for anonymous nodes in different orders.

Is something like element number a standard piece of such APIs? 
Any sort of standardized identifier of the sort?

> As a parser writer, I feel this would be a major problem to retrofit.

I was just throwing it out as a suggestion. If you feel it is 
too difficult to implement, than I'd just as well throw it away.

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 00:57:15 UTC