- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:40:28 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Graham Klyne wrote: [...] > I think that in a model, or interpretation, there are just things that are > denoted. Ah - I think thats the first time I've got stung by the ambiguity of the term 'model'. I meant to suggest that the datastructure which represents RDF/XML, i.e. the data model, must represent the anonimity, otherwise it is not representing what was in the RDF/XML that was read. > The form of the denotation used in the formal language being > interpreted (identifiers, variables, position on a piece of paper, etc.) > does not generally exist in the domain of interpretation. Thus any > distinction in the form of denotation is not material in the domain being > described. Brian
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 18:43:08 UTC