- From: dehora <acm@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:35:42 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
""" Aaron: Obviously this wouldn't work for N-Triples output from a data in which ordering information had been lost ... """ RDF doesn't have a natural ordering over statements where the above would make sense. You'd be imposing a convenience ordering over RDF syntax parsers that doesn't exist in the _model or grammar(s). Plus more brittle implementations which are looking at the ordering rather than the implied graph, might miss possible equivalences... but that's programming with side effects for you. I don't see why tag URIs can't be used for anon nodes...maybe I don't see why anon nodes need to be made equivalent or consistent in the first place. Bill
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 21:35:39 UTC