- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:58:12 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 01:01 PM 7/11/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >Here's some questions (with proposed answers) to get us thinking about >rdfms-graph. I'm also curious whether there are other questions that >should be considered part of the resolution -- the issue description isn't >really enough for me to tell. > >1) Does an RDF graph have a URI? > >It is a Resource, and it can. M&S does not define a specific one. I agree. I'm not sure anything more needs to be said. Any such URI is not part of the abstract syntax/model. >2) Is an RDF graph a set or a bag? > >A set, as it has conjunctive assertion semantics, or whatever they're called: > (A && A) => (A) Again, I agree. I'm not sure anything more needs to be said. >3) Can a node exist in a graph without any properties? > >Yes. This is indicated in the current XML syntax with an empty Description >element. Here, I disagree: there is no obvious way to represent an isolated node in an abstract syntax/model based on triples. I think an empty <Description> adds nothing to the semantics so should not appear in the abstract syntax/model. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 07:36:26 UTC