- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@baltimore.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:16:06 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 01:34 PM 7/13/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >On Friday, July 13, 2001, at 01:22 PM, pat hayes wrote: >>However, maybe I was wrong, but I have been assuming that 'literal' >>referred not only to <data:..> but also to things like <string:..> and >><integer:....>, ie data types more generally (??). If so, I think it >>wouldnt be correct to say that all of these only denote themsleves, eg >>something labelling an integer wouldn't actually be an integer. > >Well, while the current M&S doesn't deal with data-typing (AFAIK), "data:" >URIs do provide that function. It uses a MIME type to define the type of >the data. For example: > > <data:literal/integer:10> > <data:literal/string:foo> > >But what makes you think that literal refers to these concepts? I don't >see anything like that in the spec. Another data: point... to get literal/integer recognized as a MIME type would require a new IETF standards-track RFC, something that I don't think would be easily achieved for that particular idea. A MIME subtype registration might give you something like: <data:text/literal-integer,10> but I'm not sure if it's worth the effort. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 10:51:46 UTC