Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal

>
>I propose therefore that:
>
>  o a literal be regarded as a pair (s,l) where s is a string of ISO10646
>    characters and l is either null or a language identifier as
>    defined in RFC 1766 or its successors.

If l is null, is (s,l) the same as s? I ask because in LISP, (a nil) 
is not the same as a.

Pat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
(650)859 6569 w
(650)494 3973 h (until September)
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 01:29:27 UTC