- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:29:34 -0700
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> >I propose therefore that: > > o a literal be regarded as a pair (s,l) where s is a string of ISO10646 > characters and l is either null or a language identifier as > defined in RFC 1766 or its successors. If l is null, is (s,l) the same as s? I ask because in LISP, (a nil) is not the same as a. Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------- (650)859 6569 w (650)494 3973 h (until September) phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 01:29:27 UTC