RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?

At 02:37 PM 7/5/01 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote:
>We should consider having a futures document, detailing issues
>identified as relevant but out of scope for this iteration.

We do (or, a section of a document):

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#futures

#g
--


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 10:26:54 UTC