- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:40:57 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 09:08 PM 7/16/01 +0100, I wrote:
>At 01:56 PM 7/16/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>>I'm unclear on the difference between model theory and abstract syntax.
>>Can someone clarify?
>
>I'll take a shot; I guess the real formal systems folks will put me right...
>
>I think they are clearly different, but related, issues.
>
>- Abstract syntax defines a language (i.e. a set of well formed formulae,
>or wff) in terms of some set of terminal symbols. Given a formula, it
>allows us to say whether or not it is a well formed sentence (instance) of
>the language. It also provides us with an annotation for the the
>structure of a wff that can be used as a reference point for defining
>semantics for the various allowed forms. In summary: abstract syntax is
>primarily about forms.
On reflection, that's not quite right... I think it's closer to say that
an abstract syntax captures the essential forms of a language, without
necessarily providing detailed rules for recognition of wffs. This group
has decided to use N-triples as the basis for its abstract syntax, in which
case it does define a specific form of wff, but I don't think this is
necessarily true of all abstract syntax.
Although I've often heard the term used, and think I have a feel for what
it means, I don't believe I've ever seen a specific definition of "abstract
syntax".
#g
--
>- Model theory defines semantics for the various allowed forms, by telling
>us how they can be interpreted in terms of some universe of
>discourse. The elements of the language refer to members of the universe,
>and statements can be interpreted to be true or false of of such a
>universe. An "interpretation" of a formula is an assignment of values
>from the domain of discourse to symbols in the formula, such that the
>formula can be said to true or false. A "model" of a formula is an
>interpretation for which the formula evaluates to true. Hence "model theory".
>
>- A third related concept is "proof theory": a deductive apparatus based
>on syntactic transformations of wffs that preserves truth.
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2001 03:41:46 UTC