Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon

Graham Klyne wrote:
[...]
> So where does this leave the original discussion?  I think we still have
> every anonymous resource being something whose existence is asserted.

Winding back the stack, (is the data still there?) you objected to the
use case on the grounds that it represented a query template and was thus
not sanctioned by M&S.

I think we've got to the point where this is a legitimate use case.  Yes?

Brian

Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 18:40:05 UTC