- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:01:05 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'm worried that this is a bit of a leap for RDF V1.0.
#g
--
At 01:13 PM 7/11/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>On this issue I agree with Dan Connolly that an RDF literal with XML
>content parses to the RDF representation of the XML infoset for that literal.
>
>For more details, see:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0061.html
>
>I'd settle for it parsing to the canonical XML for the literal, but I
>think this is easier and more useful.
>
>--
> "Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web
> <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
><http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 07:36:26 UTC