W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

rdfms-graph: Food for thought

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:01:10 -0500
To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010711180110.MGEX14081.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@localhost>
Here's some questions (with proposed answers) to get us thinking 
about rdfms-graph. I'm also curious whether there are other 
questions that should be considered part of the resolution -- 
the issue description isn't really enough for me to tell.

1) Does an RDF graph have a URI?

It is a Resource, and it can. M&S does not define a specific one.

2) Is an RDF graph a set or a bag?

A set, as it has conjunctive assertion semantics, or whatever 
they're called:
	(A && A) => (A)

3) Can a node exist in a graph without any properties?

Yes. This is indicated in the current XML syntax with an empty 
Description element.

Do people disagree and/or think there are other questions that 
need to be answered?
       "Aaron Swartz"      | ...schoolyard subversion...
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://aaronsw.com/school/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | because school makes kids dumb
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 14:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:02 UTC