- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:01:10 -0500
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Here's some questions (with proposed answers) to get us thinking
about rdfms-graph. I'm also curious whether there are other
questions that should be considered part of the resolution --
the issue description isn't really enough for me to tell.
1) Does an RDF graph have a URI?
It is a Resource, and it can. M&S does not define a specific one.
2) Is an RDF graph a set or a bag?
A set, as it has conjunctive assertion semantics, or whatever
they're called:
(A && A) => (A)
3) Can a node exist in a graph without any properties?
Yes. This is indicated in the current XML syntax with an empty
Description element.
Do people disagree and/or think there are other questions that
need to be answered?
--
"Aaron Swartz" | ...schoolyard subversion...
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://aaronsw.com/school/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | because school makes kids dumb
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 14:01:17 UTC