- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:43:59 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:38:05AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > Art Barstow wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:38:20PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > > > > > <s> _:name <o> is true in I under substitution SUBST if and only if: > > > > > > s and o are members of U, SUBST(_:name) is a member of P and > > > (IN(s), IN(o)) is a member of IEXT(SUBST(_:name)) > > > > My take on the current definition of predicate in: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ntriples/#predicate > > > > is that it does does not allow a predicate to be a annon node. > > Whoa! where did that come from? > > Please change that back to > > triple ::= term ws+ term ws+ term ws* '.' ws* > term ::= uriref | namedNode | literal Seems like it would be a rather significant change to: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#model if subjects and predicates could be literals. Art ---
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2001 14:44:00 UTC