public-credentials@w3.org from March 2021 by author

Adam Stallard

• Re: Transcription of Selected Parts of the DIF SDS/CS March 11, 2021 Zoom Call: Hub and EDV Discussion featuring Daniel Buchner’s Description of a Hub (Wednesday, 24 March)

Adrian Gropper

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: [sds-wg] Is there an equivalent to the "OSI Network Stack" but for storage and storage access? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)

Alan Karp

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Tuesday, 30 March)

Bill Claxton, NextID Founder & Operations Director

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)

Brent Shambaugh

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Production Ready ... Congratulations! (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Looking for context for ASM (Monday, 8 March)
• Categorical Query Language (Wednesday, 3 March)

Brent Zundel

• Re: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Tuesday, 2 March)

Chris Were

• Re: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Feb 25 2021 (Wednesday, 3 March)

Christopher Allen

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Friday, 19 March)

Daniel Burnett

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)

Dave Longley

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)

David Chadwick

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Crypto ontology? (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)

David Waite

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Tuesday, 23 March)

detlef.huehnlein@ecsec.de

• Cross Community Working Group for Vaccination Certificate Service Interoperability (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Solid Standardization of Basic Signature Technology for Verifiable Credentials (was: AW: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof)) (Monday, 29 March)
• AW: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)

Dmitri Zagidulin

• Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 25, 2021 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 4 2021 (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Wednesday, 3 March)

Drummond Reed

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 21 March)

Furkan KAMACI

• Re: Production Ready ... Congratulations! (Saturday, 27 March)

Gabe Cohen

• Re: SDS/CS WG: Trusted Content Storage (TCS Stack): Decentralized Twitter (Dewitter) App Scenario - completed and posted (Monday, 8 March)

George Artem

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)

George Lund

• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)

Heather Vescent

• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• W3C Credentials CG Call Wed, March 24 @10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm GMT (Monday, 22 March)
• ANNOUNCE: CCG 101 work item kick off meeting: March 16, 2pm pt / 6pm et / 7am KST +1 (March 17) (Thursday, 11 March)
• [AGENDA] W3C Credentials CG Call Wed, March 10: Part 1 @7am PT, 10am ET, 3pm GMT & Part 2 @10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm GMT (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: Announce: CCG 101 Work Item Interest (Tuesday, 2 March)

Henry Story

• did-jws, http signature was: Crypto ontology? (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: Crypto ontology? (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Crypto ontology? (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Crypto ontology? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Crypto ontology? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Identity as relational - was: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Identity as relational - was: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: HTTP-Signatures - was: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Monday, 8 March)
• HTTP-Signatures - was: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Monday, 8 March)

Ivan Herman

• W3C starting the charter work on Linked Data Signatures (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Linked Data Security (slide deck) (Monday, 1 March)

Jack Tanner

• [Proposed Work Item] Verifiable Credentials - new DID verificationMethod type (Friday, 26 March)

Jacksón Smith

• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)

Jeff Stephens

• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)

Jeremy Townson

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)

Jim St.Clair

• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)

John, Anil

• Production Ready ... Congratulations! (Friday, 26 March)
• Presentations/ Demo Videos >> DHS/SVIP Interoperability Plug-Fest 2 // VC/DID/Blockchain Multi-Platform & Multi-Vendor Interoperability Showcase (Sunday, 21 March)
• RE: DHS/SVIP Interoperability Plug-Fest 2 : Features Under Test ... (Monday, 8 March)
• DHS/SVIP Interoperability Plug-Fest 2 : Features Under Test ... (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: Digital Vaccination Certificates -- Here Be Dragons! (Monday, 1 March)

Juan Caballero

• Re: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)

Kaliya IDwoman

• Good Health Pass Blueprint drafting kicks of Monday (Friday, 26 March)

Keith Jansa

• National Standard of Canada Under Development (Thursday, 18 March)

Kerri Lemoie

• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)

Kim Hamilton

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Thursday, 25 March)

Kim Hamilton Duffy

• Canceling today’s vc-edu meeting (Monday, 22 March)
• Tomorrow's VC-ED call (3/8) is canceled (Sunday, 7 March)

kimdhamilton@gmail.com

• [AGENDA: VC-EDU] Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call Mon, Mar 29, 11am ET,8am PT (Monday, 29 March)
• [AGENDA: VC-EDU] Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call Mon, Mar 15, 11am ET,8am PT (Monday, 15 March)
• [AGENDA: VC-EDU] Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call Mon, Mar 01, 11am ET,8am PT (Monday, 1 March)

Kristina Yasuda

• Re: Okta Acquires Auth0 for $6.5B (Thursday, 4 March)

Leonard Rosenthol

• Re: TDW Glossary [was: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge)] (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Thursday, 18 March)

Liam R. E. Quin

• crypto art (Wednesday, 10 March)

Maillet LAURENT (GOVTECH)

• RE: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Solid Standardization of Basic Signature Technology for Verifiable Credentials (was: AW: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof)) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Saturday, 27 March)
• RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Crypto ontology? (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Confidential Storage Specification Refactoring 0.1 – March 24, 2021 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Wednesday, 10 March)
• W3C Decentralized Identifier Standard timeline (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: HTTP-Signatures - was: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Looking for context for ASM (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Feb 25 2021 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Linked Data Security (slide deck) (Tuesday, 2 March)

Margo Johnson

• Re: WHO SVC "Smart Vaccination Certificate" interim guidance (Wednesday, 31 March)

Marius Goebel

• Re: crypto art (Thursday, 11 March)

Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)

• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 28 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 28 March)
• RE: Something fun (Sunday, 28 March)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Confidential Storage Specification Refactoring 0.2 – March 24, 2021 - updated from version 0.1 (Sunday, 28 March)
• RE: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)
• List of Existing EDV Service Instance Prototype/PoC Implementations? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• PROPOSAL: Confidential Storage Specification Refactoring 0.2 – March 24, 2021 - updated from version 0.1 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• PROPOSAL: Confidential Storage Specification Refactoring 0.1 – March 24, 2021 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: Transcription of Selected Parts of the DIF SDS/CS March 11, 2021 Zoom Call: Hub and EDV Discussion featuring Daniel Buchner’s Description of a Hub (Wednesday, 24 March)
• TDW Glossary [was: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge)] (Wednesday, 24 March)
• (Updated) Agent-Hub-EDV Architecture Reference Model (AHE-ARM) 0.1 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Transcription of Selected Parts of the DIF SDS/CS March 11, 2021 Zoom Call: Hub and EDV Discussion featuring Daniel Buchner’s Description of a Hub (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: Is there an equivalent to the "OSI Network Stack" but for storage and storage access? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Is there an equivalent to the "OSI Network Stack" but for storage and storage access? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• RE: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• [sds-wg] TDW Hub Architecture Reference Model (HUB-ARM) (Friday, 12 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)
• RE: SDS/CS WG: Trusted Content Storage (TCS Stack): Decentralized Twitter (Dewitter) App Scenario - completed and posted (Monday, 8 March)
• SDS/CS WG: Trusted Content Storage (TCS Stack): Decentralized Twitter (Dewitter) App Scenario - completed and posted (Saturday, 6 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Feb 25 2021 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Feb 25 2021 (Wednesday, 3 March)

Michael Ruminer

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)

Mike Prorock

• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)

Mike Varley

• Re: Roadmap: Verifiable Trust Standards (Monday, 1 March)

Moses Ma

• I have a crazy idea (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Something fun (Sunday, 28 March)
• Something fun (Sunday, 28 March)

Nathan Aw

• Re: Digital Vaccination Certificates -- Here Be Dragons! (Monday, 1 March)

Neil Thomson

• RE: [sds-wg] Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 11, 2021 (Thursday, 11 March)

Nikos Fotiou

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Reminder and Agenda for Confidential Storage Spec Call - Mar 18, 2021 (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• RE: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Thursday, 11 March)
• Some (negative) thoughts about did:key and multicodec. (Wednesday, 10 March)

Oliver Terbu

• EthereumEip712Signature2021 Proposal > Feedback appreciated (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Digital Vaccination Certificates -- Here Be Dragons! (Monday, 1 March)

Orie Steele

• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: VC-JWT perma-thread (was: Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Thursday, 25 March)

Phillip D. Long

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Friday, 26 March)

Pindar Wong

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Production Ready ... Congratulations! (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)

sankarshan

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)

Sid Sharma

• Re: I have a crazy idea (Wednesday, 31 March)

Stefan More

• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Friday, 19 March)

steve capell

• WHO SVC "Smart Vaccination Certificate" interim guidance (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: Something fun (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: DHS/SVIP Interoperability Plug-Fest 2 : Features Under Test ... (Saturday, 6 March)

Steven Rowat

• Re: I have a crazy idea (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters Candidate Recommendation stage (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Identity as relational - was: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Wednesday, 24 March)

Taylor Kendal

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 23 March)

Tobias Looker

• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: RDF Dataset Canonicalization - Formal Proof (Sunday, 28 March)

Troy Ronda

• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• did:orb slides (Wednesday, 3 March)

victorsyntez

• Re: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Do we want a "What is SSI discussion" at future CCG call? (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: The "self-sovereign" problem (was: The SSI protocols challenge) (Monday, 22 March)

W3C CCG Chairs

• [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-31 12pm ET (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-24 12pm ET (Thursday, 25 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C CCG Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call - 2021-03-15 12pm ET (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-10 12pm ET (Wednesday, 10 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-10 12pm ET (Wednesday, 10 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-10 12pm ET (Wednesday, 10 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C CCG Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call - 2021-03-01 12pm ET (Friday, 5 March)
• [MINUTES] W3C CCG Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Call - 2021-02-22 12pm ET (Friday, 5 March)

Wayne Chang

• Re: [MINUTES] W3C Credentials CG Call - 2021-03-31 12pm ET (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [AGENDA] W3C Credentials CG Call Wed, March 31: 10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm GMT (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: How to verify the did:key document is authorized by the private key holder ... JWS? (Friday, 19 March)
• 17 March CCG Meeting Cancelled (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Building a did:key document with a publicKeyJwk (Friday, 12 March)
• CCG part-time co-op role (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Okta Acquires Auth0 for $6.5B (Thursday, 4 March)
• [AGENDA] W3C Credentials CG Call Wed, March 3, 10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm GMT, 7pm CET (Wednesday, 3 March)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2021 22:41:18 UTC