- From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:42:53 -0400
- To: Steve Capell <steve.capell@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)" <mwherman@parallelspace.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANYRo8gyySxp8B2aMFPiafPrcLka_hYirUbJYarrOCTjBaHOMg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Steve, I'm happy to be a sounding board. We can use this thread if it suits your purpose. Adrian On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 4:25 PM Steve Capell <steve.capell@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael > > As a contractor to Australian government I deal with policy makers almost > every day and so I understand both the difficulty and the necessity of > conveying these concepts to non technical audiences. > > As a sufficiently technical reader, I liked your article. It’s the first > time I’ve seen that meta-model of the identity domain and, for me, it was > very helpful. > > However, sadly, I don’t think it will help the policy maker that is not > used to reading meta models. I usually have more success with storyboards > that contrast two architectures with real examples. Policy makers don’t > need to “understand the architecture”. They need to be able to > conceptualise how it works through examples to that they can understand the > policy impacts and opportunities. > > I also need to convey these ideas - both to AU and UN sometime over the > next month or so. I’ll need to test my communication materials on non > technical people to ensure the message has worked - and also on expert SSI > community members to ensure that the message is right. For that latter > concern, please let me know if anyone in this group is willing to be a > sounding board > > Kind regards > > Steven Capell > Mob: 0410 437854 > > On 21 Mar 2021, at 4:47 am, Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) < > mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote: > > > > RE: In prep calls for the panel and other mentions of our work, the > “Self-Sovereign Identity” concept is treated as controversial. In a recent > major webinar about mandated protocols by the US regulators themselves, > they referred to “Distributed Identity”. > > > > I’m trying to address the same issue wrt what is “Self-Sovereign Identity” > / “SSI” at its very core. > > > > Check out: https://hyperonomy.com/2021/02/01/ssi-unconscious-contractions/ > > > > I’m looking for additional people who share a similar perspective. > > > > Best regards, > > Michael > > > > *From:* Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com> > *Sent:* March 20, 2021 8:58 AM > *To:* Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > *Cc:* W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject:* The SSI protocols challenge [Was]: W3C DID Core 1.0 enters > Candidate Recommendation stage > > > > It is indeed a big deal and cause for celebration. > > > > From my perspective the next challenge is to get the protocols right from > a human-centered and community perspective. > > > > For an example of that challenge, on March 30 I’m on a Digital Credentials > panel at the ONC (US Federal healthcare regulator) Annual Meeting. In prep > calls for the panel and other mentions of our work, the “Self Sovereign > Identity” concept is treated as controversial. In a recent major webinar > about mandated protocols by the US regulators themselves, they referred to > “Distributed Identity” :-? > > > > Let us celebrate and consider the Fun times ahead.... > > > > Adrian > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:16 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 has reached the Candidate > Recommendation > stage at W3C. The current specification can be found here: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/CR-did-core-20210318/ > > This is a major milestone in the W3C global standards process. It marks the > start of a period of 1-4 months where the official W3C Working Group has > communicated that it is done with all features in the specification. > > The W3C DID WG has also communicated that the specification is stable > enough > to collect implementation experience from the global implementer community. > Once the WG collects enough implementation experience, it may then make > final > adjustments before publishing the v1.0 global standard, which is expected > at > the end of September 2021. > > I have attached an image with an (unofficial) graphical depiction of the > DID > standards history and expected future timeline. > > Congratulations to everyone that contributed to get us to this point; this > is > a big deal and cause for celebration. :) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2021 20:43:18 UTC