- From: Marius Goebel <marius.goebel@spherity.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:02:37 +0100
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@fromoldbooks.org>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKR4xtjNDpW4K0nGWif1YH2wwiURy9ZyAc1dm6J5wEtcBL4E2A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Liam, not really an answer to the points you brought up, but regarding "crypto" art you may be interested to have a look at the latest article by Dimitri De Jonghe regarding Arts 3.0: https://medium.com/keyko/building-rare-effect-decentralized-virtual-and-interactive-c61e68d1e787 Stay sphered ;-) Marius -- *Marius Goebel* Manager Marketing & Sales, CISO *Mobile* +49 1511 26 666 61 *Mail* marius.goebel@spherity.com *Skype* marius.goebel.skype Spherity GmbH <http://www.spherity.com/> | Emil-Figge-Straße 80 | 44227 Dortmund LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/spherity> | Blog <https://medium.com/spherity> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/spherityproject/> Managing Directors: Dr. Carsten Stöcker, Dr. Michael Rüther Registered in Dortmund HRB 31566 On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM Liam R. E. Quin <liam@fromoldbooks.org> wrote: > Has anoyone here been following the "crypto art" stuff? > > The idea is to store ownership in a blockchain and prevenance > stenogrpahically, as far as i can determine, in digital art. > > There have been protests because of the "high encironmental impact of > anything using blockchain", and ArtStation withdrew its anouncement to > support crypto art. I'm not at all sure the scheme needs to have an > especially high encironmental impact - it's not mining for bitcoins > after all - so maybe it's an example of the need for careful messaging? > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ > Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ > XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. > Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org > > >
Received on Monday, 15 March 2021 08:08:15 UTC