public-prov-wg@w3.org from September 2011 by author

Carl Reed

• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Friday, 9 September)

Cresswell, Stephen

• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 29 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 27 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Sunday, 25 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011 (Wednesday, 7 September)

Deus, Helena

• provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing (Tuesday, 6 September)
• FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 (Tuesday, 6 September)
• FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 (Tuesday, 6 September)
• email to send second questionnaire (Thursday, 1 September)

Eric Stephan

• Connection Informal Report and Connection Task Force Monday meeting. (Sunday, 18 September)

ericphb@gmail.com

• Finalizing Connection Task Force Informal Report...Due September 29 (Monday, 26 September)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Friday, 23 September)
• Revised model document (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 Sep 2011 (and RDF named graph reqs) (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Wednesday, 21 September)
• RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: Roles (Saturday, 17 September)
• Issue 89 - why? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Reviewing outstanding issues on PAQ document. (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-73: Use "anchor" context URI instead of introducing a "target" relationship in HTTP [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Sep 2011 (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Saturday, 10 September)
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: proposed name for standard is PROV (deadline September 14th midnight GMT) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing (Friday, 9 September)
• Apologies (was: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: FW: provenance questionnaire, v2 (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: views, complements and invariants (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-79 (provenance-uri-contract): what is the contract associated with provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 1 September)

James Cheney

• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: links across specs (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: links across specs (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Tuesday, 20 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: formal semantics strawman (Friday, 9 September)

Jim McCusker

• FRBR and information resource provenance (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: name straw poll (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: name straw poll (Tuesday, 6 September)

Kai Eckert

• Re: Liaison to W3C Provenance Working Group (Tuesday, 27 September)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Roles (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Roles (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Sunday, 11 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)

Luc Moreau

• proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology (Friday, 30 September)
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-29 (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 29 Sep 2011 (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: links across specs (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• links across specs (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-86 (High-level-overview): The conceptual model needs a high level overview [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 21 September)
• new release of PROV-DM document (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Roles (Thursday, 15 September)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 15 Sep 2011 (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Re: Draft agenda 15 Sep tccordination telecon (Wednesday, 14 September)
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-08 (Friday, 9 September)
• proposed name for standard is PROV (deadline September 14th midnight GMT) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Thursday, 8 September)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 08 Sep 2011 (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 2 September)
• name straw poll (Friday, 2 September)
• Meeting minutes 2011-09-01 (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 1 September)

Myers, Jim

• RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Friday, 30 September)
• RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Thursday, 29 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 29 September)
• RE: RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 29 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: formal semantics strawman (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Saturday, 24 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• RE: Unifying RDF Provenance Use Case: Trust (Thursday, 22 September)
• RE: formal semantics strawman (Wednesday, 21 September)
• RE: Issue 89 - why? (Monday, 19 September)
• RE: Issue 89 - why? (Saturday, 17 September)
• RE: Roles (Friday, 16 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: formal semantics strawman (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: formal semantics strawman (Thursday, 15 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Saturday, 10 September)
• RE: name straw poll (Tuesday, 6 September)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Tuesday, 6 September)
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)
• RE: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)
• RE: Definition of Entity (Friday, 2 September)

Paolo Missier

• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: new release of PROV-DM document (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Roles (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Roles (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: name straw poll (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Primer proposal (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)

Paul Groth

• PROV-ONT: turtle for ontology examples (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-WG: Minutes of Sept 22 2011 (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 23 September)
• PROV-WG Minutes 15 September 2011 (Wednesday, 21 September)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 22 Sep 2011 (Tuesday, 20 September)
• scribe for this week? (Tuesday, 20 September)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-107 (interoperability-rdf-serialization): is example provenance serialization in RDF inter-operable? [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-103 (qualifiers-and-roles): Qualifiers and roles in the ontology [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-99: prov:eventuallyUsed - a transitive version of prov:used. [Formal Model] (Monday, 19 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-98: add "generated" to conceptual and OWL models [Formal Model] (Monday, 19 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-97 (TLebo): define prov:wasComplementOf [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-95 (Recipes as Classes): Recipes as classes? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Saturday, 10 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-93: wasDerivedFrom is an owl sub-propety of dependedOn [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 7 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 2 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-88 (Provenance-container): Provenance container seems an unnecessary concept (Thursday, 1 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 1 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-86 (High-level-overview): The conceptual model needs a high level overview [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 1 September)
• PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 1 September)

runnegar@isoc.org

• RE: Finalizing Connection Task Force Informal Report...Due September 29 (Monday, 26 September)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Friday, 23 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Unifying RDF Provenance Use Case: Trust (Wednesday, 21 September)
• New mailing list: RDF/Prov joint task force (Thursday, 15 September)
• RDFWG+ProvWG Joint Meeting about "Graphs" (eg Named Graphs) (Wednesday, 7 September)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document (Thursday, 29 September)
• Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3) (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Issue 89 - why? (Sunday, 18 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Roles (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)

Simon Miles

• Comments on the current data model (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Primer skeleton (Friday, 9 September)
• News ontology (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-85 (What-is-Entity): Definition of Entity is confusing, maybe over-complex [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Primer proposal (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Saturday, 3 September)
• Re: Is _this_ what is meant by "Entity"? (Saturday, 3 September)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: provenance, authorization, audit trails and licensing (Tuesday, 6 September)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-107 (interoperability-rdf-serialization): is example provenance serialization in RDF inter-operable? [Formal Model] (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: mercurial changes (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ONT: turtle for ontology examples (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 30 September)
• Re: ProvenanceContainer (Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document) (Thursday, 29 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-102 (hadRecipe): Ontology is missing recipe link [Formal Model] (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF named graph use case and requirement (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: formal semantics strawman (Wednesday, 21 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: Roles (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Roles (was: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance) (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-92 (remove-individuals): Remove example individual from ontology [Formal Model] (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: name straw poll (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-84 (namespace-for-properties): What should namespace for properties be? [Formal Model] (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: name straw poll (Tuesday, 6 September)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: mercurial changes (Friday, 30 September)
• mercurial changes (Wednesday, 28 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Friday, 16 September)
• named graphs materials (Thursday, 15 September)
• Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance (Thursday, 8 September)

Yolanda Gil

• Re: Connection Informal Report and Connection Task Force Monday meeting. (Thursday, 22 September)
• Re: Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs (Wednesday, 14 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2011 21:03:08 UTC