W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:38:58 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|53d7a15d4936ec558d82d523d5307f4bn8RHd308L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E834DA2.9090608@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Daniel,

Thanks for raising this issue. I'd like to add the question:
"How do we find all the assertions that belong to a given account"
and associated to this issue is the question of name scoping introduced 


On 09/28/2011 05:17 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/106
> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
> On product: Formal Model
> Account definition is missing in the formal model document, diagrams, ontology and examples.
> This issue is also a reminder to discuss how we should model them: as a separate entity or as a subclass of Provenance Container.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 16:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:09 UTC