- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:46:40 +0100
- To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paolo, There were a list of object properties that were defined based on the relationships in the conceptual model. These properties, their cardinalities and their characteristics, e.g., functional, are likely to be modified, since some of the relationships in the conceptual model are still under discussion. The following figure illustrates the object properties defined so far: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/images/9/9a/Object_Properties_overall_diagram.png Hope that answer your question. khalid On 08/09/2011 10:53, Paolo Missier wrote: > Hi, > > what's the state of the ontology wrt associating a set of properties > to an entity? > > thanks, -Paolo > > On 9/8/11 8:29 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 23:51, Satya Sahoo<satya.sahoo@case.edu> wrote: >>> The OWL files seems to have been corrupted during previous updates to >>> mercurial. The original OWL file I had uploaded did not include any >>> datatype >>> properties or assertions about individuals. >>> I have restored to correct version on mercurial, please review if >>> possible. >>> Thanks for pointing this out! >> Looks good! I'll come with some more detailed comments and write-up of >> my thoughts as I've quickly done a plugin for exporting Taverna >> provenance according to the ontology. >> >> Should I do suggested changes as a feature branch.. or how are we >> using the mercurial repository? > > >
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 12:47:04 UTC