Re: PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model]

All,

Yesterday's straw poll shows strong support for PIL.
In fact, with one vote per member, PIL may well be voted as the name for 
the standard.

It's problematic for the conceptual model.  It is *NOT* a language.

Cheers,
Luc


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Sep/0014.html



On 07/21/2011 07:34 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/31
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
> Proposals:  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/NameSuggestions
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm