W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:19:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4E69E822.4000704@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Stian,

very good.
Minor question: what happened to the port names? e.g.  string1, string2,... those used to be carried over to the provenance trace as 
role names. I guess they can still be added?

Cheers, -Paolo

On 9/9/11 10:24 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:49, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>> Yes, but not that many. Perhaps I should try to express that
>> provenance manually using the syntax used in the model document.
> Updated http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TavernaProvenance using
> ontology in past tense.
>
>
> Abstract provenance syntax:
>
> see https://github.com/stain/taverna-prov/blob/master/example/zip-prov-abstract.txt
>   (transcribed from the RDF and given easier identifiers)
>
> and https://github.com/stain/taverna-prov/blob/master/example/zip-prov-abstract-ideal.txt
> (filled in additional info)
>
>
> This last representation shows me that the abstract model can express
> pretty much all the information we have in Taverna's provenance
> (except for details on collections, iterations, errors, runtime
> environment and and the workflow definition itself) - so that is very
> promising.
>
>
>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 10:19:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:41 GMT