W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

RE: name straw poll

From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:41:29 +0000
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3131E7DF4CD2D94287870F5A931EFC2301841F@EX14MB2.win.rpi.edu>
Or Provenance Assertion STandard for PAST?

From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes
Cc: Luc Moreau; Provenance Working Group WG
Subject: Re: name straw poll


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk<mailto:soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
So how about we make these 3 the only contenders, and see what
negative "blockers" we would have if any, before doing a formal vote?

Here are mine:


PIF - reminds me of that Windows thing for running DOS programs. (not blocker!)

PIL - not just a language!

PAST - Good, except the backronym - SchemaTa? "Ta" is something we
casually say for "Thanks" here in UK. Also, too many possible types of
schematas involved, RDFS, OWL, XSD? The model? SQL? I can picture "Are
you using the PAST schema?" confusions.

How about Provenance Assertion STructure or Provenance Assertion SysTem?

Jim
--
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu<mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | (203) 785-6330
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mccusj@cs.rpi.edu<mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu>
http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:42:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:41 GMT