- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:12:25 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Graham, Issue is now closed pending review. Issue was addressed in latest version of document, as summarized in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Sep/0192.html Cheers, Luc On 01/09/2011 17:42, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-87 (Model-concepts-formalism): Formalism used is not explained, not applied to concepts [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/87 > > Raised by: Graham Klyne > On product: Conceptual Model > > The "Abstract Syntax Notation" formalism used in the concepts document is not fully explained - only a syntax is given. Yet, all the uses of the formalism are in examples: it is not (cannot be?) used to formally describe the actual concepts. As such, it doesn't really seem to serve any useful purpose. Or if it does, that purpose is not clear. > > See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0383.html > > > > >
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 11:14:02 UTC