W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: name straw poll

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:02:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=SZ233cPbGTUyU_mHW4ppXWmOnQi8Wfz0HXG20cZ6ci8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> So how about we make these 3 the only contenders, and see what
> negative "blockers" we would have if any, before doing a formal vote?
>
> Here are mine:
>
>
> PIF - reminds me of that Windows thing for running DOS programs. (not
> blocker!)
>
> PIL - not just a language!
>
> PAST - Good, except the backronym - SchemaTa? "Ta" is something we
> casually say for "Thanks" here in UK. Also, too many possible types of
> schematas involved, RDFS, OWL, XSD? The model? SQL? I can picture "Are
> you using the PAST schema?" confusions.
>

How about Provenance Assertion STructure or Provenance Assertion SysTem?

Jim
--
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 16:03:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:41 GMT