W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:26:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtk7DMTHUqWOFLcwx0M7wRj_E2GnTmUiUqjWNE3ZP0StmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:29, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> 1. Given this confusion, Paul and I would like to propose that we drop the
> terminology 'Formal Model'.
>   Can you express your support or disagreement for this proposal?

+1

 (specially as currently the conceptual model seems like the most formal model!)


> 2. Assuming we adopt the proposal, what should the document title become, we
> leave it to authors/editors to decide.

>   To get the ball rolling: 'semantic web representation/model/serialization
> of provenance'

A bit long!  Can be shortened to "PROV-SW" to somewhat match "PROV-DM".


"PROV Ontology" is my suggestion - or PROV-O for short.   (provocation..?)

(Serialisation recommendations like "At least provide RDF/XML, always
explicitly assert any PROV class/property" might fight better in PAQ)

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 12:26:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:42 GMT