W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance

From: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:16:31 -0600
Message-ID: <9E273BAA4C3449628A525A2C675BB919@CarlandSusieOf>
To: "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Stian -

I just read the following article today.

http://geopw.whu.edu.cn/docs/files/provenanceservice.pdf

You might find the geospatial workflow requirements, use case, and 
technology solution approach interesting.

Regards

Carl Reed
OGC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Testing the ontology for expressing workflow provenance


On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 15:51, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> This is cool! Have you identified issues with the conceptual model too?

Yes, but not that many. Perhaps I should try to express that
provenance manually using the syntax used in the model document.


I'll formalise my (potential) issues and put them in the tracker so we
can discuss them one by one.


-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 01:17:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:41 GMT