- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:24:15 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, What should we do about ISSUE-42 and ISSUE-43. Are they still relevant? Can they be closed? Thanks, Luc On 22/08/2011 22:16, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Given the current document, is this issue still relevant? > If yes, are we referring to isDerivedFrom? > Which time (more precisely event) do you have in mind? use event? > generation event? > associated process start event, associated process end event? > potentially a combination of all the above? > > Luc > > On 23/07/11 16:46, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated >> time [Conceptual Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/43 >> >> Raised by: Paul Groth >> On product: Conceptual Model >> >> Other relationships have time associated with them (e.g. use, >> generation, control) >> >> There is no optional time associated with derivation. >> >> Suggested resolution is to add the following to the definition of >> isDerivedFrom: >> >> - May contain a "derived from time" t, the time or time intervals >> when b1 was derived from b2 >> >> Example: >> isDerivedFrom(b1,b2, t) >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 11:25:31 UTC