- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:16:44 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
We are closing this issue pending review. We went for the following: - introduce events as part of the conceptualization - introduce the concept of partial order between order but - not make events an explicit type of the data model, though use the term 'event' in explanations - not make relation 'precede' between events an explicit construct of the model Luc On 25/08/2011 10:16, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/82 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: Conceptual Model > > > The notion of event is defined implicitly, but not listed as one of the concepts. Would it facilitate the presentation of the model to define this concept explicitly. > > See James' comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0349.html > > See Satya's comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0342.html > > > >
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 11:17:56 UTC