public-xg-webid@w3.org from December 2011 by author

Andreas Kuckartz

• Re: funding? (Tuesday, 20 December)

Andreas Radinger

• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)

Andrei Sambra

• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)

Baptiste Lafontaine

• Re: [foaf-protocols] Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Friday, 9 December)
• Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Friday, 9 December)

bergi

• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Sunday, 11 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Tuesday, 6 December)
• ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Monday, 5 December)

Birte Glimm

• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Thursday, 8 December)

Bob Wyman

• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (was: Re: using HTTP 'From' request header) (Friday, 16 December)

David Chadwick

• comments on draft (Friday, 16 December)

Dominik Tomaszuk

• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: WebID with XMPP, SIP, ...? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Friday, 16 December)
• References again and other comments (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Profile Tricks was: Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Saturday, 3 December)
• Profile Tricks was: Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Saturday, 3 December)

elf Pavlik

• types in 2.2 Publishing WebID Profile Document (Saturday, 17 December)
• WebID with XMPP, SIP, ...? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)

Henry Story

• Re: spec definitions, CAs, SSL handshake (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: The Science of Insecurity (Thursday, 29 December)
• The Science of Insecurity (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: workaround for Opera and Safari (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: workaround for Opera and Safari (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: workaround for Opera and Safari (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: working turtle RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Thursday, 22 December)
• The Format Game -- Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• A possible workaround for Opera and Safari (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Major Milestone: WebID over WebSockets (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Major Milestone: WebID over WebSockets (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: World Wide Web of Trust (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: WebIDs for people listed in the WebID Spec? (Tuesday, 20 December)
• World Wide Web of Trust (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Peter Williams looking for Microsoft Windows developers for WebID (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: types in 2.2 Publishing WebID Profile Document (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: WebID with XMPP, SIP, ...? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (was: Re: using HTTP 'From' request header) (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (was: Re: using HTTP 'From' request header) (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: comments on draft (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: The SPARQL Query (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)
• romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 12 December 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Friday, 9 December)
• Re:Privacy concern: different FOAF file depending on what website is asking (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: Back to IIS -Was: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Thursday, 8 December)
• FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 12 December 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Back to IIS -Was: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: References again and other comments (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Spinoza and Identity (Tuesday, 6 December)
• blog on WebID in French (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Tuesday, 6 December)
• SPDY Google Chrome and Firefox (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: Profile Tricks was: Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: Profile Tricks was: Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)

Jiří Procházka

• Mandatory client supported serializations (Friday, 30 December)
• low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)

Jürgen Jakobitsch

• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: social recasting and webid - an asde on of RE: Mandatory client supported serializations (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Mandatory client supported serializations (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Mandatory client supported serializations (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: needs someone to replicate a windows validator, done in non native (i.e. user mode) SSL. (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Friday, 30 December)
• How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: incubating profiles, and webid-powered sparql server endpoints as trust network "routers" (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: incubating profiles, and webid-powered sparql server endpoints as trust network "routers" (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• OpenID and foaf:openid (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Another Translator for RDF (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: webid to openid to azure to shib (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: workaround for Opera and Safari (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: webid to openid to azure to shib (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Domain of cert:key (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: openid content negotiation RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Support for Turtle in WebID (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: twitter and facebook as graph hosts (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• WebIDs for people listed in the WebID Spec? (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Peter Williams looking for Microsoft Windows developers for WebID (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: comments on draft (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Back to IIS -Was: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Back to IIS -Was: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)
• Structured Data Tools (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)

Lee Fisher

• Re: PGP aside (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Peter Williams looking for Microsoft Windows developers for WebID (Monday, 19 December)
• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)

Leif Warner

• Re: [foaf-protocols] low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: [foaf-protocols] low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Domain of cert:key (Friday, 23 December)
• Domain of cert:key (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: World Wide Web of Trust (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: World Wide Web of Trust (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: types in 2.2 Publishing WebID Profile Document (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Reworked introduction (Tuesday, 6 December)

Mischa Tuffield

• The SPARQL Query (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Wednesday, 14 December)

Mo McRoberts

• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• Re: Domain of cert:key (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: World Wide Web of Trust (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: World Wide Web of Trust (Wednesday, 21 December)

Natanael Arndt

• Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)

Patrick Logan

• Re: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: The Format Game -- Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Tasks in support of HTML Microdata (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Tasks in support of HTML Microdata (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Tasks in support of HTML Microdata (Thursday, 22 December)
• Turtle support for WebID profiles (Thursday, 22 December)
• Tasks in support of HTML Microdata (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)

Peter Saint-Andre

• Re: romeo and juliet (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Spinoza and Identity (Wednesday, 7 December)

Peter Williams

• Re: Mandatory client supported serializations (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: social recasting and webid - an asde on of RE: Mandatory client supported serializations (Saturday, 31 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Saturday, 31 December)
• social recasting and webid - an asde on of RE: Mandatory client supported serializations (Saturday, 31 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Saturday, 31 December)
• spec definitions, CAs, SSL handshake (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Saturday, 31 December)
• Re: Mandatory client supported serializations (Friday, 30 December)
• Delegate Certs (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: How To Handle WebIDs for (X)HTML based Claim Bearing Resources (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: needs someone to replicate a windows validator, done in non native (i.e. user mode) SSL. (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: needs someone to replicate a windows validator, done in non native (i.e. user mode) SSL. (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] low memory & WebID? (Friday, 30 December)
• needs someone to replicate a windows validator, done in non native (i.e. user mode) SSL. (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: PGP aside (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Friday, 30 December)
• Re: PGP aside (Friday, 30 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: PGP aside (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: The Science of Insecurity (Thursday, 29 December)
• using encoded cert (signed) as adjunct to unsigned mod (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: Another Translator for RDF (Thursday, 29 December)
• RE: incubating profiles, and webid-powered sparql server endpoints as trust network "routers" (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• incubating profiles, and webid-powered sparql server endpoints as trust network "routers" (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Wednesday, 28 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Tuesday, 27 December)
• RE: neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Tuesday, 27 December)
• neither FCNS nor FOAFSSL can read a new foaf card (hosted in Azure). RDFa validators at W3C and RDFachecker say its fine... (Tuesday, 27 December)
• RE: xmas present for w3c (Monday, 26 December)
• xmas present for w3c (Monday, 26 December)
• RE: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• synonym anchors, in RDFa (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: webid to openid to azure to shib (Friday, 23 December)
• webid to openid to azure to shib (Friday, 23 December)
• openid content negotiation RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• working turtle RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Friday, 23 December)
• RE: broken turtle (Thursday, 22 December)
• broken turtle (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Tasks in support of HTML Microdata (Thursday, 22 December)
• twitter and facebook as graph hosts (Thursday, 22 December)
• report on https webid trials, FCNS FOAFSSL.ORG (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: Major Milestone: WebID over WebSockets (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Thursday, 22 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• RE: World Wide Web of Trust (Wednesday, 21 December)
• funding? (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Peter Williams looking for Microsoft Windows developers for WebID (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: WebID with XMPP, SIP, ...? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Saturday, 17 December)
• RE: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Saturday, 17 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: publickey link relation for WebFinger? (was: Re: using HTTP 'From' request header) (Friday, 16 December)
• RE: comments on draft (Friday, 16 December)
• RE: comments on draft (Friday, 16 December)
• php, iis, certs and webid (Friday, 16 December)
• RE: The SPARQL Query (Wednesday, 14 December)
• RE: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• RE: a remark on the webid spec (Wednesday, 14 December)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)
• unit test site - test root (Saturday, 10 December)
• Re: Back to IIS -Was: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Wednesday, 7 December)
• RE: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Wednesday, 7 December)
• RE: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• RE: ExplorerKeygen - keygen element for IE (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: default hashtags (Saturday, 3 December)
• RE: default hashtags (Saturday, 3 December)
• RE: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• RE: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• RE: default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• default hashtags (Friday, 2 December)
• fcns test site and IE logout, webid-style (Friday, 2 December)
• RE: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: Cache, Cert Creation and Keychains (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)
• RE: TLS-Light (Thursday, 1 December)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Redirects continued -- was: Problem with certificate on home-grown WebID (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)
• a remark on the webid spec (Monday, 12 December)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Re: Domain of cert:key (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)
• New draft 12 December 2011 (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: References again and other comments (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Friday, 9 December)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles (Friday, 23 December)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 December 2011 23:27:07 UTC