- From: Natanael Arndt <NatanaelA@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:56 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: public-xg-webid XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
- Message-ID: <4EE74DB4.3000603@gmx.de>
On 13.12.2011 13:20, Henry Story wrote: > > > > On 13 Dec 2011, at 12:48, Natanael Arndt wrote: > >> Ok, >> I have changed the datatypes to xsd:, but [1] tells me to use cert: >> >> --- start citation from [1] --- >> <cert:key> >> <cert:RSAPublicKey> >> <rdfs:label>made on 23 November 2011 on my laptop</rdfs:label> >> <cert:modulus rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#hexBinary"> >> 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 >> </cert:modulus> >> <cert:exponent rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#integer">65537</cert:exponent> >> </cert:RSAPublicKey> >> </cert:key> >> --- end citation from [1] --- > > Very well spotted Natanal . That was an error I introduced yesterday > before the release. I have fixed it in the editor's draft > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html#in-rdf-xml > > and we should make a quick fix release very soon. Thanks. So please also add the Datatype to the exponent in the Turtle example [2]. >> And I have removed the seeAlso, because it doesn't exist anymore. > > You can have an rdfs:seeAlso from your WebID Profile to something > else. In fact on the WebId list we > were just discussing what would be a good relation to point to a > protected resource. > > >> But why should I remove the owl:Ontology? It is just a resource of >> rdf:type foaf:Person and owl:Ontology. > > This is not really related to WebID, so I don't think it's an issue > here, but people are not ontologies, so that you will later > have trouble with that. But I don't want to get into a debate on that > - if you can't see it then you'll experience it at a later point. > >> The redirect is cause by our LinkedData extension for OntoWiki, >> because I thought its easier to manage a WebID with an OntoWiki >> compared to editing a text-file. Is there any other application which >> I can use to manage and server my WebID? > > Well this makes for an interesting use case. Can you mail the WebID > list the details of this setup in a new thread > on redirects. We are interested to see where redirects can be useful > to justify possibly introducing this added complexity > into the spec. We are trying to keep things as simple as possible to > get implementors on board. So we need to understand > why things like redirects could be useful, and also then look at the > issues with security these may entail. I don't think > they do, but we then need to look at those issues. Is "public-xg-webid XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>" the right address for the WebID mailinglist? > > For the moment it is certainly simpler to not use redirects. I think > foafssl.org <http://foafssl.org> will accept them though. Who is responsible for foafssl.org? > > Henry > >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#in-rdf-xml >> >> Thank you for your help >> Natanael [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html#turtle Natanael
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 20:18:09 UTC