W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [foaf-protocols] foafssl.org login

From: Natanael Arndt <NatanaelA@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:05:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4EE74DB4.3000603@gmx.de>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: public-xg-webid XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
On 13.12.2011 13:20, Henry Story wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2011, at 12:48, Natanael Arndt wrote:
>> Ok,
>> I have changed the datatypes to xsd:, but [1] tells me to use cert:
>> --- start citation from [1] ---
>>      <cert:key>
>>        <cert:RSAPublicKey>
>>          <rdfs:label>made on 23 November 2011 on my laptop</rdfs:label>
>>          <cert:modulus rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#hexBinary">
>> 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
>>         </cert:modulus>
>>          <cert:exponent rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#integer">65537</cert:exponent>
>>        </cert:RSAPublicKey>
>>      </cert:key>
>> --- end citation from [1] ---
> Very well spotted Natanal . That was an error I introduced yesterday 
> before the release. I have fixed it in the editor's draft
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html#in-rdf-xml
> and we should make a quick fix release very soon. Thanks.
So please also add the Datatype to the exponent in the Turtle example [2].

>> And I have removed the seeAlso, because it doesn't exist anymore.
> You can have an rdfs:seeAlso from your WebID Profile to something 
> else. In fact on the WebId list we
> were just discussing what would be a good relation to point to a 
> protected resource.
>> But why should I remove the owl:Ontology? It is just a resource of 
>> rdf:type foaf:Person and owl:Ontology.
> This is not really related to WebID, so I don't think it's an issue 
> here, but people are not ontologies, so that you will later
> have trouble with that. But I don't want to get into a debate on that 
> - if you can't see it then you'll experience it at a later point.
>> The redirect is cause by our LinkedData extension for OntoWiki, 
>> because I thought its easier to manage a WebID with an OntoWiki 
>> compared to editing a text-file. Is there any other application which 
>> I can use to manage and server my WebID?
> Well this makes for an interesting use case. Can you mail the WebID 
> list the details of this setup in a new thread
> on redirects. We are interested to see where redirects can be useful 
> to justify possibly introducing this added complexity
> into the spec. We are trying to keep things as simple as possible to 
> get implementors on board. So we need to understand
> why things like redirects could be useful, and also then look at the 
> issues with security these may entail. I don't think
> they do, but we then need to look at those issues.
Is "public-xg-webid XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>" the right address for 
the WebID mailinglist?
> For the moment it is certainly simpler to not use redirects. I think 
> foafssl.org <http://foafssl.org> will accept them though.
Who is responsible for foafssl.org?
> Henry
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#in-rdf-xml
>> Thank you for your help
>> Natanael

[2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html#turtle

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 20:18:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:50 UTC