- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:09:26 +0100
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Cc: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 12 Dec 2011, at 18:32, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > On 12/12/2011 05:45 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> >> On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:24, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> having a look at the WebID spec, I spotted a few mistakes in the RDF/XML >>> example: >>> >>> * the rdfs namespace is not declared >>> * the closing tag for rdfs:label misses the leading '/' >>> * the datatypes xsd:hexBinary and xsd:integer should be expanded URIs, >>> not CURIEs >> >> very well spotted, Pierre. Thanks a lot. We have updated the spec here >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/add4f836470d >> >> WE fixed this in today's meeting >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/12/12-webid-minutes.html >> >> and we should have a new spec with all the latest changes out today. >> >> Does one really have to use full URLs for datatypes? That's really a bit lame... > > well, unless I missed something the RDF/XML recommendation, I'm pretty > sure you have to... > > And I agree, it is a bit lame... That would be one point in favour of using Turtle as the other MUST format, (and drop rdf/xml) Though we would need quite a few other serious reasons to do something like that. Henry > > pa > >> >> Henry >> >> >>> >>> best >>> >>> pa >>> >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 18:16:07 UTC