W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:55:45 -0500
Message-ID: <4EF36111.7010305@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 12/22/11 11:32 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote:
> let the WebID core specification
> be abstract, based on Linked Data ideal, not requiring specific format,
> then have a separate specification aimed at interoperability and
> adoption, specifying restrictions such as
If you are suggesting the above, then I am in violent agreement with you!

There's no harm in having complimentary implementation guides for 
RDF/XML, RDFa, Microdata, Turtle.

TimBL's design issues note (*original version*) for Linked Data is a 
classic example of an implementation guide for publishing Linked Data at 
InterWeb scales, courtesy of AWWW exploitation :-)

Henry: RDF and SPARQL specificity was added retrospectively.


1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- TimBL's Linked Data 
Design Issues Note.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 16:56:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:50 UTC