- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:55:45 -0500
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EF36111.7010305@openlinksw.com>
On 12/22/11 11:32 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote: > let the WebID core specification > be abstract, based on Linked Data ideal, not requiring specific format, > then have a separate specification aimed at interoperability and > adoption, specifying restrictions such as If you are suggesting the above, then I am in violent agreement with you! There's no harm in having complimentary implementation guides for RDF/XML, RDFa, Microdata, Turtle. TimBL's design issues note (*original version*) for Linked Data is a classic example of an implementation guide for publishing Linked Data at InterWeb scales, courtesy of AWWW exploitation :-) Henry: RDF and SPARQL specificity was added retrospectively. Links: 1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- TimBL's Linked Data Design Issues Note. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 16:56:13 UTC