W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service

From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:42 -0800
Message-ID: <SNT143-W275416F901836F3B3EA6E592A50@phx.gbl>
To: <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>

 I tried it with sourcforge, and the result was the same as with an RPX-powered (at amazone) RP. I also tried to bind the openlink IDP (with webid) to the Azure bridge, but failed; as summarized here: http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1J7  The site really needs to be (and claim to be) v2. Ill guess this is the crux of the issues. but, it all looks good. Just some minor fiddles required, I suspect. Wont be long before webid is (indirectly) powering a SAML2 protocol exchange to the academic networks. of course, they have had client certs  and https client authn inducing a SAML exchange for years (in a profile focussed on ldap as the repository of the graph). But, this will be cuter; as its all native semweb.From: home_pw@msn.com
To: kidehen@openlinksw.com; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; public-xg-webid@w3.org
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:46:48 -0800
Subject: RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service

Which RP site should I try, ideally?
My trial results, at http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1Im

> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:36:45 -0500
> From: kidehen@openlinksw.com
> To: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; public-xg-webid@w3.org
> Subject: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service
> All,
> I've dropped a note about the above at: http://goo.gl/zC7tP .
> It's basically a decoupling of what we had in ODS re. WebID+OpenID 
> delivered in a manner similar to: http://openid4.me .
> -- 
> Regards,
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 23:18:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:50 UTC