- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:10:20 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 22 Dec 2011, at 17:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 12/22/11 11:32 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote: >> let the WebID core specification >> be abstract, based on Linked Data ideal, not requiring specific format, >> then have a separate specification aimed at interoperability and >> adoption, specifying restrictions such as > If you are suggesting the above, then I am in violent agreement with you! Yes, we had that this summer and nobody on this list did anything then. Jiri do you have a WebID implementation of any kind? > > There's no harm in having complimentary implementation guides for RDF/XML, RDFa, Microdata, Turtle. > > TimBL's design issues note (*original version*) for Linked Data is a classic example of an implementation guide for publishing Linked Data at InterWeb scales, courtesy of AWWW exploitation :-) > > Henry: RDF and SPARQL specificity was added retrospectively. You mean RDF/XML specificity. People here seemed to be quite happy with it SPARQL is not required. Look at the text it has 2 paragraphs on how you can do the same without SPARQL. Just a few moments ago you were saying how turtle is great because it has sparql which is like turtle. Henry > > Links: > > 1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- TimBL's Linked Data Design Issues Note. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder& CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 17:10:52 UTC